Current:Home > ScamsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -WealthRoots Academy
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-12 09:53:07
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (66858)
Related
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- Georgia bill aimed at requiring law enforcement to heed immigration requests heads to governor
- UNLV releases video of campus shooter killed by police after 3 professors shot dead
- Who wouldn’t like prices to start falling? Careful what you wish for, economists say
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Chicago-area doctor sexually abused more than 300 patients and hospitals ignored it, lawsuit claims
- California woman says her bloody bedroom was not a crime scene
- Summer House's Lindsay Hubbard Made This NSFW Sex Confession Before Carl Radke Breakup
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Brittney Griner re-signs with the Phoenix Mercury, will return for 11th season in WNBA
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- The Texas attorney general is investigating a key Boeing supplier and asking about diversity
- Lizzo Seemingly Quits Hollywood Over “Lies” Told About Her
- Ayesha Curry Details Close Friendship With Great Mom Lindsay Lohan
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Love Lives of Selling Sunset: Where Chelsea Lazkani, Christine Quinn & More Stand
- How Travis Kelce Continues to Proves He’s Taylor Swift’s No. 1 Fan
- Chicago-area doctor sexually abused more than 300 patients and hospitals ignored it, lawsuit claims
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
International Court Issues First-Ever Decision Enforcing the Right to a Healthy Environment
Ayesha Curry Weighs in on Husband Steph Curry Getting a Vasectomy After Baby No. 4
Lawsuit accuses Special Olympics Maine founder of grooming, sexually abusing boy
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Flying during the solar eclipse? These airports could see delays, FAA says
Powerlifter Angel Flores, like other transgender athletes, tells her story in her own words
Powerlifter Angel Flores, like other transgender athletes, tells her story in her own words