Current:Home > ScamsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -WealthRoots Academy
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Johnathan Walker View
Date:2025-04-07 00:23:18
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (54)
Related
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- She was an ABC News producer. She also was a corporate operative
- Dylan Sprouse and Supermodel Barbara Palvin Are Engaged After 5 Years of Dating
- A Chick-fil-A location is fined for giving workers meals instead of money
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Global Carbon Emissions Unlikely to Peak Before 2040, IEA’s Energy Outlook Warns
- 2022 marked the end of cheap mortgages and now the housing market has turned icy cold
- Missouri man convicted as a teen of murdering his mother says the real killer is still out there
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Activists Call for Delay to UN Climate Summit, Blaming UK for Vaccine Delays
Ranking
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Why Kim Kardashian Is Feuding With Diva of All Divas Kourtney Kardashian
- Investors prefer bonds: How sleepy government bonds became the hot investment of 2022
- Cupshe Blowout 70% Off Sale: Get $5 Swimsuits, $9 Bikinis, $16 Dresses, and More Major Deals
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Elon Musk says he will resign as Twitter CEO once he finds a replacement
- How 2% became the target for inflation
- 2022 marked the end of cheap mortgages and now the housing market has turned icy cold
Recommendation
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
Dwyane Wade Weighs In On Debate Over Him and Gabrielle Union Splitting Finances 50/50
Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $300 Crossbody Bag for Just $59
Amid blockbuster decisions on affirmative action, student loan relief and free speech, Supreme Court's term sees Roberts back on top
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
Southwest plans on near-normal operations Friday after widespread cancellations
At a French factory, the newest employees come from Ukraine
Extremely overdue book returned to Massachusetts library 119 years later